Hidden Riches

From a historical perspective, 'The DaVinci Code' isthe world flood and its implications for
good fiction ...I do think the book has provided ahumanity.The vital lesson of Noah's story is the
very real cultural benefit, though. By weavinghuman capacity for self-destruction and the ability
many tales of medieval Christian mysticism intoof one person to save the world.
its story line, the book has stimulated a multitudeIn our time, we possess the capability to quickly
of readers to look beyond the veneer of printeddestroy creation through our nuclear power or to
words in search of higher meanings. This is good,slowly and significantly damage our planet through
because both literature and history contain themwaste and pollution. Like Noah's generation, we are
in abundance. The richness of the written wordalso able to corrupt the purpose of our existence
and the refining effects of time have producedthrough moral failure.When we come to think that
works essential to our lives' innerwe or our creations are invincible, we soon find
guidance.Hopefully, more people will be inspired byourselves in deep water, just like the people of
this work of fiction to more fully explore otherNoah's generation. Even the most powerful of
tomes that have even deeper meanings.I'mhuman beings must face their limits or be brought
referring to the Bible, the Torah, and thelow.The tale of Noah's ark is about confronting
Koran.Many of the world's tensions have theirboth our power and our limitations as individuals
roots in opinion leaders who espouse literaland as society. The story is true not because it
interpretations of those volumes. Even moreever happened, but because it keeps on
preposterous is that many of these issues arehappening.The Noah story is true, because it
fomented by their own self-serving versions ofdescribes a drama we all face, generation after
those interpretations. From the silly 'War ongeneration.When we go beyond the literal sense
Christmas' campaign being waged by someof the text, we find meaning and relevance. When
religious conservatives in the USA to the tragicwe can see our own struggles in the text, we
turf wars over perceived sacred grounds in thecan then take hold of the meaning of our sacred
Middle East, power bases masquerading as pulpitstexts.Rabbi Naftali Zvi Yehuda Berlin, an authority
exploit literal definitions of holy words to seekon the interpretation of the Hebrew Bible and a
nothing more than an increase in their sphere ofgiant of 19th century Judaism, maintained that the
influence. It is not enough for them to swayentire Hebrew Bible "possesses the nature and
likeminded individuals, they cannot wield sufficientthe central character of poetry." One must be
power until they can alter the lives of those whoaware of poetic allusions, metaphors and
have chosen a different moral path, no matterfigurative expressions to appreciate the meaning
how independently righteous that path may be.Iof scripture.How could it be any other way?
believe an effective means of curbing thisHardly a verse in the Hebrew Bible can be
troubling tendency is to expose the shallownessunderstood verbatim. Take the statement, "And
of such literal espousings. And so, I would like toGod said." Does God have a larynx? In what
share an article written in 2000 by Rabbi H Davidlanguage did God speak?To read Torah with the
Rose, entitled:"The Literal Truth? Pondering thequestion, "Did it happen?" in our minds is to think
Variety of Interpretations in Scripture."It is one ofof the wrong question. As Elie Wiesel has taught,
the best dissertations on the subject that I have"Not everything that happened is true, nor did
ever read.The balance of today's column consistseverything that is true necessarily happen."We all
of Rabbi Rose's words:"Dear God," Donna wrote.have the capacity to recognize truth in art, in
"Last week it rained for five days straight. Wemovies and in plays, whether they accurately
thought it would be like Noah's ark, but it wasn't.portray something that really happened or
I'm glad because you could only take two of eachnot.Imagine that two books are lying before us.
animal into the ark, and I have three cats."AThe first book was written by a Dr. Smith, an
professor of molecular biology wrote in a nationaleminent ophthalmologist. It describes a
magazine, "Given the dimensions of the ark andcomplicated surgery which restored the eyesight
its wooden construction, the first stiff breezeof a Ms. Jones.Ms. Jones is the author of the
would have broken it up. Its capacity was only asecond book. In this book, Ms. Jones reports her
fraction of what was needed for the animals andfright, her anxiety and her pain. Then she tells of
their food supply, not to speak of their specializedher exultation after the bandages were removed
needs for housing."Are the narratives in the Bibleand she could see again.Should we ask which book
fact or fiction? Were the prophets truth-tellers, oris the truth? Each book has a different intention
great storytellers? Did Methuselah live upon thisand shares a different perspective. The doctor's
earth for 969 years, as we are taught intruth is not that of the patient. A single criterion
Genesis? Did Abraham send his first child, Ishmael,of truth creates needless contradictions. Both are
out into the wilderness and almost sacrifice histrue. Similarly, there is no single true way to read
son, Isaac?And is any of this relevant to us andscripture.Our sacred texts are sources of truth
to our lives?Many who read the Bible do so in aand meaning, and we must learn to open our
literal way. For these people, be they Christian oreyes to them.A literal viewing of our traditional
Jew, the choice is simple: Either the Bible is thebooks may obscure the truths within them, or
exact written record of God's words, or it isworse, cause us to turn away and not look
not.If it is God's word, then it is to be followedagain.Most of us learned scripture only as children.
exactly as written. If not, then whyWe were taught only literal explanations.When we
bother?Others, including myself, are convincedgrew up, we outgrew such literal fairy tales and
that to read our sacred texts literally is to missleft them tucked away with the tooth fairy and
the point. To do so, in my opinion, is to corruptother such nonsense.As adults, our task in reading
and stagnate the ever-growing relevance of ourthe treasures of our traditions and in living lives
holy texts.The Zohar (a book of Jewishbased on scripture is to uncover the layers of
mysticism) teaches, "Were the Torah (Bible) ameaning. When we study, read and meditate on
mere book of tales and everyday matters, weour sacred words, we discover their spritual
could compose a text of even greater excellence.implications.May we hold on to our sacred texts,
The Torah has clothed itself in the outerand may they guide our lives and give meaning to
garments of the world, and woe to the personall that we do.J Square Humboldt is the featured
who looks at the garment as being Torah."Incolumnist at the Longer Life website, which is
other words, the essence of God's message isdedicated to providing information, strategies,
hidden from a person who takes a literal view.analysis and commentary designed to improve
The word is not the message; the message liesthe quality of living. His page can be found at and
behind the words.Consider the story of Noah'shis observations are published three times per
ark. A literal interpretation misses the relevanceweek.
and profound moral symbolism of the story, of